|
Search the News Archive |
Spoilers are currently disabled. (All newsposts are visible.) |
October 3, 2007 Link to this post
Wednesday's Review Roundup
Lots and lots and lots of reviews in our inbox:
- Ars Technica continues their analysis of Halo - this one isn't so much a review as it is a debate between editors (thanks, Jota Rota)
- Adelaide Now says it's a 10/10 - a little short in Campaign, but more than makes up for it in Multiplayer.
- The Central Connecticut State University Recorder says Halo 3 'doesn't leave much room for disappointment'.
- 8BitJoystick says it's dope.
- Game Industry News gave it a 5/5.
- University of Alabama's Crimson White gave it a 3/4, found a few parts frustrating
- The Notre Dame/St. Mary's College Observer loved the multiplayer
- Charlston City Paper liked the multiplayer more than single, as well
- Canada.com gave it a 5/5 and said it's worth the hype.
- GameCritics feels cheated; they don't think Bungie tried very hard to deliver what Halo 3's advertising promised (thanks, Chi Kong Lui)
So: mostly good, a couple of minor complaints, and one real disappointment. Not bad! (Louis Wu 15:54:33 UTC)
