Spoilers are currently disabled. (All newsposts are visible.)
Search results for tech/gamecore/
Showing results 1 - 8 of 8 matches September 24, 2005 Link to this post Stubbs - in the Spotlight Our favorite CBS News gamer, William Vitka, has posted an article about Stubbs the Zombie (good read!) - thanks, 3Suns... and Inside Mac Games gets some info about the Mac port of that game from Glenda Jackson, of Aspyr (thanks, Narcogen). (Louis Wu 11:44:52 UTC)
April 7, 2005 Link to this post Art on an assembly line William Vitka's latest Gamecore article on CBSNews.com looks at the idea of a Halo movie... from the standpoint of someone who's worried about the 'mogulization' of video games (more and more games being made by fewer and fewer developers, with big-budget sequels getting the nod over edgy indie releases). Will the 'right' people be able to guide the development of a Halo film, or will any such project be taken over by movie company executives who simply want to blow up more stuff? (Louis Wu 19:32:21 UTC)
March 25, 2005 Link to this post Videogame Violence Feedback William Vitka posted another piece today in his GameCore series about videogame violence - this one is a collection of email feedback he's received on the rest of the articles. It's interesting that more than one of the letters involve interaction with Jack Thompson, the lawyer who suggests that videogame violence drives our children to murder - and in each of those cases, polite requests for clarification were met with curses and vulgarity. Says a lot about the guy, doesn't it? Go read! (Louis Wu 20:57:43 UTC)
March 16, 2005 Link to this post Gaming - from a retail perspective William Vitka's Violence in Videogame series at CBSNews.com continues with an interview with Hal Halpin, president of the Interactive Entertainment Merchants Association. This one's a little different than older ones in the series - the questions aren't the same, but the idea - to explore the effect of violence in videogames on our society - hasn't changed. Halpin's professional stance is predictable - after all, he represents game retailers, so it's not surprising that he opposes legislation that would ban the sale of videogames in certain markets - but he makes some interesting points. Games that are marketed as violent and with gratuitous sex or violence in order to sensationalize, typically aren't good games and wouldn't sell if it weren't for politicians and the media hyping the title. I wonder if the politicians understand this? Go check out the piece - it's an interesting read! (Louis Wu 20:21:22 UTC)
March 14, 2005 Link to this post PlanetDoom Editor talks about violence The next GameSpeak, the series of interviews at CBSNews.com about violence in videogames, has been posted - this one has Jeff McAllister, of PlanetDoom, taking a crack at the questions. Not surprisingly, Jeff falls firmly into the 'video games are no better or worse than other forms of entertainment' camp. Coming up in the series: a huge 'Mailbag Blast-O-Rama' article containing some of the email readers received when trying to contact Jack Thompson (that should be FUN), and an interview with Hal Halpin, president of the Interactive Entertainment Merchants Association. Stay tuned! (Louis Wu 22:18:48 UTC)
March 9, 2005 Link to this post My own views on violence Whee - tooting my own horn! The next installment of the CBS News 'Violence in Gaming' series has been posted - and it's me answering the questions this time around. Remember - as is true with all pieces in this series, the questions were answered without reading any of the other respondents' replies. This is starting to feel like a 'Pile on Jack Thompson' collection... but that wasn't the intent at all. (I didn't even know he was among the people interviewed when I answered these questions.) As always - discussion on our forum is great... but please stay away from general politics; limit the discussion to this topic (violence in videogames), in order to keep the flames to a minimum. Thanks! Update: oops, seems I lied. The last half of the second-to-last question WAS in direct response to Mr. Thompson's piece; it was added after the original interview, from an email exchange I had with William Vitka. The REST of the questions, however, were answered 'in a vacuum', with respect to other interviewees. (Louis Wu 19:34:39 UTC)
March 8, 2005 Link to this post Videogame violence - the discussion continues Spenser noticed the next installment of William Vitka's series on video game violence at CBSNews.com - this interview is with Scott Ramsoomair, of VG Cats. This one's a bit more 'off the cuff' - someone who doesn't take the issue quite as seriously as say, Jack Thompson. And for those who think that discussion in THIS community is reactionary and thought-free, you should read this post by SPARTAN-01110101 - he makes a point that certainly opened MY eyes a little... Update: I'm a little behind, so I'm just noticing a link to a pretty interesting Thompson rebuttal on Friday's Penny Arcade news page. Lots of good points in there. (Louis Wu 13:30:25 UTC)
March 6, 2005 Link to this post GameSpeak: Video Game Violence William Vitka is a columnist with CBSNews.com - we mentioned his very first piece, a look at the power of Halo 2, back in November. Recently, he began publishing a series of interviews focused on the issue of violence in videogames; a series of questions was sent to a variety of people with opinions on the subject. The first installment was with Jack Thompson, an attorney who's been one of the most outspoken critics of video game violence; several of the claims he made were so outrageous, I chose to hold off on publicizing the series until some counterpoint material was online. (There's no faster way to incite a flamewar on our forum than the material produced by Mr. Thompson.) Last week, it was Tim Buckley, the artist behind the webcomic Ctrl+Alt+Del, in the spotlight... and I understand that this week's entry will be my own responses. I'm willing to allow discussion on our forum about this, under a few conditions: people stay civil, people refrain from ad hominem attacks (if you don't know what those are, look it up), and (maybe most important), people do NOT send nasty notes to those who've expressed opinions they don't agree with. There's no better way to vindicate a viewpoint than to show that those opposing that viewpoint need to resort to crude or vulgar language; if you disagree with an opinion, explain WHY in reasonable terms. I'll post again when my own series of answers gets posted. (Louis Wu 21:54:16 UTC)
Another Search
|